3.8 Proceedings Paper

Influence of the Electromagnetic Pulse on the Overvoltages Due to Direct Lightning to Lines over Soils with Different Ground Conductivity

出版社

IEEE
DOI: 10.1109/ICLPANDSIPDA54065.2021.9627408

关键词

distribution lines; lightning protection; direct lightning; lightning electro-magnetic pulse; grounding

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper explores the impact of shield wire on medium-voltage distribution lines in relation to lightning performance, highlighting the importance of considering the effects of electromagnetic pulses, especially in high soil conductivity conditions. The study emphasizes the need for accurate assessment of lightning risks by taking into account the influence of insulators and line response, particularly when the ground conductivity is high.
In medium-voltage distribution lines, lightning outages associated with indirect strokes are less frequent if these lines are equipped with a grounded shield wire and surge arresters are installed at close intervals. Thus, for this case, the lightning performance is mainly associated with the line response due to direct events. Recent analysis concerning medium voltage line equipped with a shield wire shows that the electromagnetic pulse radiated from the channel may enhance the over-voltage across insulators during direct strikes. This paper extends the analysis to lines over lossy soils, assuming different values of ground conductivity. The results indicate that the effect of the electromagnetic pulse needs indeed to be considered for an accurate lightning performance assessment of distribution lines with shield wire. On the one hand, the voltages across insulators increase as the soil conductivity decreases; on the other hand, it is shown that for direct strikes the difference between the voltage amplitudes calculated considering or not the LEMP contribution increases with the ground conductivity. Thus, appropriate modelling and relevant calculation tools availability is fundamental for the problem of interest.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据