3.8 Article

Ability of chlorhexidine, octenidine, polyhexanide and chloroxylenol to inhibit metabolism of biofilm-forming clinical multidrug-resistant organisms

期刊

JOURNAL OF INFECTION PREVENTION
卷 22, 期 1, 页码 12-18

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/1757177420963829

关键词

Chlorhexidine; octenidine; multidrug resistant gram-negatives; hospital-acquired infection; MRSA; biofilm

资金

  1. Sage Products LLC (Cary, IL, USA)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this in vitro study, standard antiseptics were tested for their ability to disrupt the metabolic activity of multidrug-resistant bacteria within biofilms. Chlorhexidine gluconate and octenidine showed the greatest efficacy, particularly against MRSA, while polyhexanide and chloroxylenol were less effective compared to chlorhexidine gluconate and octenidine.
Purpose: This in vitro study was designed to determine if standard antiseptics used for skin and environmental surface cleansing can disrupt the metabolic activity (as a measure of viability) of multidrug-resistant gram-negative bacteria, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus isolates within their native biofilms. Methods: Sixty clinical isolates of multidrug-resistant bacteria were selected for testing in different chlorhexidine gluconate, octenidine, polyhexanide and chloroxylenol concentrations. Metabolic inhibition of biofilm for each clinical isolate was analysed using a biofilm viability assay. Results: Chlorhexidine gluconate (mean = 83.8% 9.8%) and octenidine (mean = 84.5% +/- 6.8%) showed the greatest efficacy against biofilms of the tested microorganisms, with the greatest efficacies against MRSA. The antiseptics demonstrated the least efficacy against biofilms of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Conclusion: Chlorhexidine gluconate and octenidine showed the greatest level of bacterial metabolic inhibition and were statistically equivalent. Polyhexanide was more effective than chloroxylenol, but both were inferior to chlorhexidine gluconate and octenidine against the tested organisms.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据