4.7 Article

Association of Inhibitory Killer Cell Immunoglobulin-like Receptor Ligands With Higher Plasmodium falciparum Parasite Prevalence

期刊

JOURNAL OF INFECTIOUS DISEASES
卷 224, 期 1, 页码 175-183

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/infdis/jiaa698

关键词

KIR; HLA; malaria; Plasmodium falciparum; NK cells

资金

  1. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases [R01AI093615, K24AI113002, U19AI089674]
  2. Henry Wheeler Center for Emerging and Neglected Diseases
  3. Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research [HHSN261200800001E]
  4. Intramural Research Program of the National Institutes of Health

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study identified a relationship between KIR and HLA genotypes and the risk of Plasmodium falciparum infection, where the presence of HLA-C2 and HLA-Bw4 increased the likelihood of infection, while HLA-C1 decreased it.
Killer cell immunoglobulin-like receptors (KIRs) and their HLA ligands influence the outcome of many infectious diseases. We analyzed the relationship of compound K1R-HLA genotypes with risk of Plasmodium falciparum infection in a longitudinal cohort of 890 Ugandan individuals. We found that presence of HLA-C2 and HLA-Bw4, ligands for inhibitory KIR2DL1 and KIR3DL1, respectively, increased the likelihood of P. falciparum parasitemia in an additive manner. Individuals homozygous for HLA-C2, which mediates strong inhibition via KIR2DL1, had the highest odds of parasitemia, HLA-C1/C2 heterozygotes had intermediate odds, and individuals homozygous for HLA-C1, which mediates weaker inhibition through KIR2DL2/3, had the lowest odds of parasitemia. In addition, higher surface expression of HLA-C, the ligand for inhibitory KIR2DL1/2/3, was associated with a higher likelihood of parasitemia. Together these data indicate that stronger KIR-mediated inhibition confers a higher risk of P. falciparum parasitemia and suggest that KIR-expressing effector cells play a role in mediating antiparasite immunity.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据