4.8 Article

Material design of high-capacity Li-rich layered-oxide electrodes: Li2MnO3 and beyond

期刊

ENERGY & ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE
卷 10, 期 10, 页码 2201-2211

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c7ee01782k

关键词

-

资金

  1. Northwestern-Argonne Institution of Science and Engineering (NAISE)
  2. Dow Chemical Company
  3. Center for Electrochemical Energy Science (CEES), an Energy Frontier Research Center (EFRC) - U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences [DE-AC02-06CH11357]
  4. National Scientific Foundation (NSF) [DMR-1309957]
  5. Advanced Batteries Materials Research (BMR) Program
  6. Office of Science of the U.S. Department of Energy [DE-AC02-05CH11231]
  7. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien
  8. Division Of Materials Research [1309957] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Lithium-ion batteries (LIBs) have been used widely in portable electronics, and hybrid-electric and all-electric vehicles for many years. However, there is a growing need to develop new cathode materials that will provide higher cell energy densities for advanced applications. Several candidates, including Li2MnO3-stabilized LiM'O-2 (M' = Mn/Ni/Co) structures, Li2Ru0.75Sn0.25O3 (i.e., 3Li(2)RuO(3)-Li2SnO3), and disordered Li2MoO3-LiCrO2 compounds can yield capacities exceeding 200 mA h g(-1), alluding to the constructive role that Li2MO3 (M4+) end-member compounds play in the electrochemistry of these systems. Here, we catalog the family of Li2MO3 compounds as active cathodes or inactive stabilizing agents using high-throughput density functional theory (HT-DFT). With an exhaustive search based on design rules that include phase stability, cell potential, resistance to oxygen evolution, and metal migration, we predict a number of new Li2MIO3-Li2MIIO3 active/inactive electrode pairs, in which M-I and M-II are transition-or post-transition metal ions, that can be tested experimentally for high-energy-density LIBs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据