4.7 Article

Assessing energy efficiency and the related policy implications for energy-intensive firms in Korea: DEA approach

期刊

ENERGY
卷 133, 期 -, 页码 23-34

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2017.05.122

关键词

Data envelopment analysis; Energy efficiency; Environmental factors; Two-stage efficiency

资金

  1. Ministry of Education of the Republic of Korea
  2. National Research Foundation of Korea [NRF-2016S1A5A8017755]
  3. National Research Foundation of Korea [2016S1A5A8017755] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The Korean government has given efforts to reduce green-house gas emissions. In order to avoid the monolithic system that only focuses on reducing the emission without considering operational environments of firms, the government should encourage respective firms to improve their energy efficiency which wastes less energy but produces maximum economic revenue. This paper employed a DEA (Data Envelopment Analysis) model to measure energy efficiency of energy intensive manufacturing firms in Korea. Identifying and comparing the difference in efficiency score by using the simplified single-stage DEA model is not sufficient to give governments and firms meaningful policy implications related to energy efficiency improvement. To compensate for this insufficiency, this study extended the single stage model into a two-stage model that includes two efficiency measures: pure energy efficiency which is only for energy-related process and economy efficiency which is for the pursuit of profit, to reach the improvement of total energy efficiency. By using the two-stage DEA model, it has identified that the difference from overall energy efficiency is not caused by pure energy efficiency but rather by economy efficiency. In addition, this paper statistically analyzed the effects of environmental variables such as firm size, possession of certified management systems and emission type. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据