4.7 Article

Algae pyrolytic poly-generation: Influence of component difference and temperature on products characteristics

期刊

ENERGY
卷 131, 期 -, 页码 1-12

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2017.05.019

关键词

Algae pyrolysis; Pyrolytic poly-generation; Furans; N-containing species; Long-chain carboxylic acids; Aromatics

资金

  1. National Nature Science Foundation of China [51406061, 51622604]
  2. National Basic Research Program of China (973 Program) [2013CB228102]
  3. Special Fund for Agro-scientific Research in the Public Interest [201303095]
  4. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Pyrolytic poly-generation of three algae (Enteromorpha prolifera (EP), Spirulina platensis (SP) and Nannochloropsis sp. (NS)) was carried out in a fixed bed reactor and pyrolysis mechanism was explored in detail. Influences of pyrolysis temperature (400-800 degrees C) and biochemical components (carbohydrates, proteins and lipids) of algae on pyrolytic behavior and products characteristics were investigated. EP showed higher char yield, while SP and NS showed high bio-oil yields. At lower temperature (400-500 degrees C), CO2 was the main gas product, while H-2, CH4 and CO evolved out quickly with temperature increasing. EP cracking could release more CO, while SP and NS cracking could release more H-2, CH4 and C-2. While for bio-oil, it was variant with algae composition and temperature, as EP showed higher furans, SP yielded large amounts of N-containing chemicals, while aliphatics and carboxylic acids were the dominated components for NS. However, aromatics gradually became the major compounds for all bio-oil at 700-800 degrees C. For char, C-O/C-O-C/C=N, C=O/C-N and COO- groups cracking gradually with temperature increasing and resulted in more aromatic C=C. The optimum operating temperature is 500-600 degrees C for algae pyrolytic poly-generation to achieve higher value of char, bio-oil and gas products together. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据