4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

District heating and cooling systems - Framework for Modelica-based simulation and dynamic optimization

期刊

ENERGY
卷 137, 期 -, 页码 566-578

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2017.05.115

关键词

District heating; District cooling; Smart energy systems; Modelica; Dynamic optimization; Dynamic simulation; Mixed-integer-optimal control

资金

  1. Modelon AB
  2. project FlexEnergySys - Austrian Federal Ministry of Science, Research and Economics [848346]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Future district heating systems (so called 4th Generation District Heating (4GDH) systems) have to address challenges such as integration of (de)centralized renewable energy sources and storage, low system temperatures and high fluctuation of the supply temperature. This paper presents a novel framework for representing and simplifying on-grid energy systems as well as for dynamic thermohydraulic simulation and optimization of district heating and cooling systems. We describe physically precise and numerically robust models for simulation and continuous optimization. Futthermore, we propose a novel method to decompose a mixed-integer-optimal control problem into two sub-problems, separating the discrete part from the continuous. Two use cases show the applicability of the framework. An existing district heating system, with more than 100 consumers is adapted to test the framework based on simulation requirements of 4GDH systems. The second case presents the continuous optimization of a district heating system in a virtual city district. A main advantage of combining equation based modelling and nonlinear optimization is the possibility of including model coherences based on physical laws into the optimization formulation. Results show that the framework is well-suited for simulating larger scale 4GDH systems and that the solution time of the continuous optimization problem is sufficiently low for real-time applications. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据