3.8 Proceedings Paper

Optimal Power Dispatch of Renewable and Non-Renewable Generation through a Second-Order Conic Model

出版社

IEEE
DOI: 10.1109/EEEIC/ICPSEurope51590.2021.9584817

关键词

Emission pollutant gases; multi-objective optimization; optimal power dispatch; renewable energy; second-order conic programming

资金

  1. Sao Paulo Research Foundation (FAPESP) [2019/01841-5, 2019/23755-3, 2015/21972-6]
  2. Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel (CAPES) [001]
  3. Brazilian National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq) [304726/2020-6]
  4. FEDER
  5. FCT [POCI-01-0145-FEDER-029803 (02/SAICT/2017)]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study extends a second-order conic programming model to address the multi-objective optimal power dispatch problem, considering the probabilistic nature of power demand and renewable energy sources. The results of the SOCP model are compared with a nonlinear programming model to assess robustness and precision.
This work presents an extension of a second-order conic programming model (SOCP) to handle the multi-objective optimal power dispatch problem considering the probabilistic nature of some parameters related to power demand and the renewable energy sources (RES) generation, such as wind speed and solar irradiation level. Three objective functions are considered in this study: 1) costs of RES and non-RES generation; 2) active power losses in the transmission system; and, 3) emission pollutant gases produced by fossil fuel-based generating units. The stochastic nature of power demands and RES are developed through a set of representative operational scenarios extracted from historical data and via a scenario reduction technique. The results obtained in the SOCP model are compared with a nonlinear programming (NLP) model to check the robustness and precision of SOCP model. To this, both models are implemented and processed to simulate the optimal flow for the IEEE 57- and 118-bus systems.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据