4.7 Article

Influences of low-energy input microwave and ultrasonic pretreatments on single-stage and temperature-phased anaerobic digestion (TPAD) of municipal wastewater sludge

期刊

ENERGY
卷 123, 期 -, 页码 271-282

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2017.01.152

关键词

Anaerobic digestion; TPAD; Microwave; Sonication; Electrical energy; Pretreatment

资金

  1. City of Kelowna and BC Ministry of Environment
  2. Natural Science and Engineering Council of Canada (NSERC) Strategic Project [396519-10]
  3. Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey (TUBITAK)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The effect of low energy-input (2.5 IcJig total solids) microwave (MW) irradiation and ultrasonication (US) on single-stage mesophilic anaerobic digestion (AD) and temperature-phased AD (TPAD) treating wastewater sludge was assessed. The goal was to achieve a higher net energy along with improved digestate for agricultural applications. At sludge retention times (SRT) of 20 and 14 days, TPAD achieved significantly (39-45%) higher methane production, pathogen destruction (4-log) and digester volume reductions compared to single-stage AD (controls). The higher methane yields resulted in higher net energies for TPAD (4.7-5.1 kJ/g volatile solids or VS) compared to controls (3.3-3.7 kJ/g VS). Although improvements in organic removals and methane yields were observed after MW and US. the energy input for pretreatments were not compensated by the increased methane production, and therefore were concluded to be infeasible for industrial applications for single-stage and TPAD. All TPADs provided the highest pathogenic removal, and met the Class A biosolids fecal coliform requirements, while MW pretreatment achieved the highest fecal coliform removal for single-stage AD with digestates classified as Class B. Digesters incorporating thermal pretreatment (MW and MW + TPAD) yielded the highest amount of extra heat (4.2-5.8 kJ/g VS) that could be utilized within/outside of the facility. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据