4.7 Article

Impact of district heat source on primary energy savings of a desiccant-enhanced evaporative cooling system

期刊

ENERGY
卷 123, 期 -, 页码 432-444

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2017.02.005

关键词

District heating; Energy simulation; Regenerator; Liquid desiccant; Evaporative cooling

资金

  1. National Research Foundation (NRF) [2015R1A2A1A05001726]
  2. Korea Agency for Infrastructure Technology Advancement (KAIA) [16CTAPC116268-01]
  3. Korea Institute of Energy Technology Evaluation and Planning (KETEP) of the Republic of Korea [20164010200860]
  4. Korea Evaluation Institute of Industrial Technology (KEIT) [20164010200860] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The purpose of this research is to evaluate the primary energy savings of a desiccant-enhanced evaporative (DEVap) cooling system with a district heat source. The DEVap system consists of an internally cooled liquid desiccant dehumidifier and dew point evaporative cooler connected in series. The liquid desiccant unit requires a heat source for regenerating the weak desiccant solution, which means that the DEVap cooler is a thermally driven cooling system. It can provide energy benefits when the supplied heat comes from waste heat or renewable heat sources. In this research, district heat obtained from a combined heat and power (CHP) system was used as the heat source for the DEVap system. The primary energy consumption and CO2 emission rate of the proposed system with a district heat source were estimated using a detailed energy simulation and compared with those powered by a conventional gas boiler. The results showed that the DEVap system with district heat source consumed 46.2% less primary energy and produced 40.5% less CO2 compared with the system using the conventional gas boiler. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据