4.7 Article

Performance, economic and exergy analyses of carbon capture processes for a 300 MW class integrated gasification combined cycle power plant

期刊

ENERGY
卷 134, 期 -, 页码 731-742

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2017.06.059

关键词

IGCC; Carbon capture process; Thermal efficiency; Economic evolution; Exergy analysis

资金

  1. Korea Institute of Energy Technology Evaluation and Planning - Ministry of Trade, Industry & Energy, Republic of Korea [20158510011280]
  2. Korea Evaluation Institute of Industrial Technology (KEIT) [20158510011280] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The techno-economic analysis of the CCPs was performed for a 300 MW class integrated coal gasification combined cycle (IGCC) power plant. In the study, the a-MDEA and Selexol processes were selected for the analysis as the representative of the chemical and physical solvent-based carbon capture process (CCPs). A rigorous evaluation of dual-stage CCPs, including, power generation, economic evaluations, and exergy destruction, was performed. The net power of a-MDEA and Selexol processes was 267.3 MW and 291.4 MW, respectively, which corresponded to the thermal efficiencies of the dual-stage a-MDEA process of 32.3% and Selexol process of 35.2%. According to the economic analysis, the CAPEX of the Selexol process was approximately 1.39 tines more expensive than that of the a-MDEA process. However, the OPEX of the Selexol process for removing a ton of CO2 was approximately one third of that of the a-MDEA process. The exergy flow and destruction were also discussed to evaluate the associated impact on the major components of CCPs. Based on the exergy analysis, the suggestion to improve thermal efficiency was made and result was also briefly discussed. These results can aid in decision-making and in process development for commercial-scale CCPs with respect to thermodynamic and economic analyses. (c) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据