4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

A comparative performance analysis on daylighting for two different types of solar concentrators: Dish vs. Fresnel lens

期刊

ENERGY
卷 137, 期 -, 页码 449-456

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2017.02.168

关键词

Parabolic dish; Fresnel lens; Solar concentrator; Solar tracking; Fiber optics

资金

  1. National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) - Ministry of Science, ICT & Future Planning [2014R1A2A1A11050878, 2016R1D1A1B04934265, 2014R1A2A1A01006421]
  2. National Research Foundation of Korea [2016R1D1A1B04934265, 2014R1A2A1A11050878] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study introduces the experimental work done to analyze the performance of active daylighting systems, which consist of small individually operated solar concentrators. Each system is capable of precise solar tracking thanks to the double axis solar tracker designed and constructed for lightness and easy operation. A solar tracking algorithm was implemented with AVR based on both closed and open loop control algorithms. Two different types of solar concentrators (developed for the system) were tested to assess their photometric characteristics in collecting and delivering solar rays to a deep plan office space for better lighting. To measure illuminance at different times of the day, a number of photo sensors were installed on the task planes at a height of 85 cm above the floor. The luminance values on different walls (including task planes) were also measured at a regular interval of 30 min to assess their variation with time and solar altitude. These photometric data enabled a systematic performance evaluation of the systems employed in the present study. The experimental results demonstrated the applicability of the daylighting systems employed in this work in bringing natural daylight to the interior, especially, to those spaces too deep for conventional daylighting apertures. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据