3.8 Proceedings Paper

Speeding up Block Propagation in Bitcoin Network: A Cut-through Relaying Scheme

出版社

IEEE
DOI: 10.1109/iThings-GreenCom-CPSCom-SmartData-Cybermatics53846.2021.00063

关键词

bitcoin blockchain; networking protocol; cut-through forwarding

资金

  1. Tencent Rhinoceros Birds Scientific Research Foundation for Young Teachers of Shenzhen University
  2. Natural Science Fund of Guangdong Province [2020A1515010708]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The research team developed and validated a new block propagation protocol to increase the transaction processing speed of the Bitcoin blockchain. By improving the compact-block relaying protocol, they were able to increase Bitcoin blockchain's TPS by 100 times without compromising security and consensus-building.
We design and validate a new block propagation protocol for the peer-to-peer (P2P) network of the Bitcoin blockchain. Despite its strong protection for security and privacy, the current Bitcoin blockchain can only support a low number of transactions per second (TPS). In this work, we redesign the current Bitcoin's networking protocol to increase TPS without changing vital components in its consensus-building protocol. In particular, we improve the compact-block relaying protocol to enable the propagation of blocks containing a massive number of transactions without inducing extra propagation latency. This improvement is achieved by replacing the existing store-and-forward compact-block relaying scheme with a cut-through compact-block relaying scheme. Since our protocol only needs to rework the current Bitcoin's networking protocol and does not modify the data structures and crypto-functional components, it can be seamlessly incorporated into the existing Bitcoin blockchain. To validate our design, we implement a Bitcoin network simulator on Network Simulator3 (NS-3) to run different block propagation protocols. The experimental results confirm that our new block propagation protocol could increase the TPS of the Bitcoin blockchain by 100x without compromising security and consensus-building.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据