3.8 Proceedings Paper

Nested Sparse Feedback Codes for Point-to-Point, Multiple Access, and Random Access Channels

期刊

出版社

IEEE
DOI: 10.1109/ITW48936.2021.9611385

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Science Foundation (NSF) [CCF-1817241, CCF-1956386]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper presents variable-length feedback codes for different communication scenarios, such as point-to-point, multiple access, and random access communication. The nested code structure is designed with flexibility, optimizing decoding time selection to minimize expected decoding time while meeting error probability constraints. Effective decoding and transmission control for different numbers of active transmitters are achieved through nested coding and single-bit feedback.
This paper investigates variable-length feedback codes for discrete memoryless channels in point-to-point, multiple access, and random access communication. The proposed nested code employs L decoding times n(1), n(2), ... , n(L) for the point-to-point and multiple access channels and KL decoding times {n(k,l) : 1 <= k <= K, 1 <= l <= L} for the random access channel with at most K active transmitters; in the latter case, decoding times n(k,l), 1 <= l <= L are reserved for decoding in the scenario where the decoder believes that the number of active transmitters is k. The code has a nested structure, i.e., codewords used to decode messages from k active transmitters are prefix of codewords used to decode messages from k+1 active transmitters. The code employs single-bit, scheduled feedback from the receiver to the transmitters at each potential decoding time to inform the transmitters whether or not it is able to decode. Transmitters cease transmission, thereby truncating their codewords, when no further transmissions are required by the decoder. The choice of decoding times is optimized to minimize the expected decoding time subject to an error probability constraint, and second order achievability bounds are derived.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据