4.6 Article

The role of data in transformations to sustainability: a critical research agenda

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.cosust.2021.06.009

关键词

-

资金

  1. Belmont Forum
  2. NORFACE Joint Research Programme on Transformations to Sustainability
  3. DLR/BMBF
  4. ESRC/GCRF [ES/S006982/1]
  5. FAPESP [18/50039-4]
  6. European Commission
  7. Sao Paulo State Research Support Foundation (FAPESP) [2019/06616-0, 2019/06595-2]
  8. UK Research and Innovation through the GCRF Global Research Translation Award (EPSRC) [EP/T015683/1]
  9. ESRC [ES/S006982/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This article explores the role of digital technologies and data innovations in sustainability transformations, highlighting the importance of data in decision-making and transformative pathways. However, there is a lack of critical investigation on specific pathways for data to support sustainability transformations. A framework is proposed to analyze the scales and potential pathways of data in enabling sustainability transformations.
This article investigates the role of digital technologies and data innovations, such as big data and citizen-generated data, to enable transformations to sustainability. We reviewed recent literature in this area and identified that the most prevailing assumption of work is related to the capacity of data to inform decision-making and support transformations. However, there is a lack of critical investigation on the concrete pathways for this to happen. We present a framework that identifies scales and potential pathways on how data generation, circulation and usage can enable transformations to sustainability. This framework expands the perspective on the role and functions of data, and it is used to outline a critical research agenda for future work that fully considers the socio-cultural contexts and practices through which data may effectively support transformative pathways to sustainable development. (C) 2021 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据