3.8 Proceedings Paper

Energy Efficient Merkle Trees for Blockchains

出版社

IEEE COMPUTER SOC
DOI: 10.1109/TrustCom53373.2021.00149

关键词

Merkle Tree; Blockchain; Energy

资金

  1. NSF [1932300]
  2. Cyber Florida [220408]
  3. Division Of Computer and Network Systems
  4. Direct For Computer & Info Scie & Enginr [1932300] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Blockchain-powered smart systems deployed in industrial applications promise increased efficiency and improved yields, while reducing significant cybersecurity risks associated with the main application. However, tradeoffs between availability and security arise during implementation, triggered by additional resources required by each blockchain-enabled host.
Blockchain-powered smart systems deployed in different industrial applications promise operational efficiencies and improved yields, while mitigating significant cybersecurity risks pertaining to the main application. Associated tradeoffs between availability and security arise at implementation, however, triggered by the additional resources (e.g., memory, computation) required by each blockchain-enabled host. This paper applies an energy-reducing algorithmic engineering technique for Merkle Tree root calculations, a principal element of blockchain computations, as a means to preserve the promised security benefits but with less compromise to system availability. Using pyRAPL, a python library to measure computational energy, we experiment with both the standard and energy-reduced implementations of the Merkle Tree for different input sizes (in bytes). Our results show up to 98% reduction in energy consumption is possible within the blockchain's Merkle Tree construction module, such reductions typically increasing with larger input sizes. The proposed energy-reducing technique is similarly applicable to other key elements of blockchain computations, potentially affording even greener blockchain-powered systems than implied by only the Merkle Tree results obtained thus far.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据