4.0 Article

Utilization of bacteria in rotten Guava for production of bacterial cellulose from isolated and protein waste

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.carpta.2021.100076

关键词

Komagataeibacter intermedius isolate; Rotten Guava; Cheese whey; Bacterial cellulose; X-ray diffraction; Nonisothermal TGA; FTIR; Mechanical properties

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study aimed to optimize the production of eco-friendly bacterial cellulose from bacteria in rotten guava by using cheese whey as a cost-effective carbon/nitrogen source. Cheese whey was found to enhance the production yield and strength properties of bacterial cellulose, making it a promising alternative for economic production of bacterial cellulose for functional applications.
This work was done for optimizing the route to produce eco-friendly bacterial cellulose from bacteria in the rotten guava, and protein waste as cheap carbon/ nitrogen source in production medium. In this respect Komagataeibacter intermedius MO was isolated and identified. The protein-based waste (cheese whey) was evaluated as effective carbon/ nitrogen source in growth medium, in comparison with well-known medium (Seed medium). The role of cheese whey was studied individual and as substituting half of glucose or yeast of Seed medium. The X-ray diffraction, FT-IR spectra and TGA analysis were the techniques used in assessment together with production yield and strength properties. In comparison with seed medium the half substitution of yeast by cheese whey in seed medium exhibited enhancement of isolated Komagataeibacter intermedius MO in production of BC pellicles with high crystallinity, thermal stability and strength properties (tensile and elasticity). Moreover, despite its production yield was lower than that produced from seed medium, but it equivalent to BC production yield on using Hestrin- Schramm (HS) medium. This protein-waste suggested for modification of seed medium for economic production of BC for functional application.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据