4.1 Article

Association Between New-Onset Medicaid Home Care and Family Caregivers' Health

期刊

JAMA HEALTH FORUM
卷 2, 期 9, 页码 -

出版社

AMER MEDICAL ASSOC
DOI: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2021.2671

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Institute of Aging [T32AG51108]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study examined the association between Medicaid home care services and family caregivers' health, revealing a significant improvement in self-rated mental health among family caregivers when their family members began receiving Medicaid home care services. No changes were found in self-rated physical health.
Importance More than 17 million people in the US provide uncompensated care for adults with physical or cognitive limitations. Such caregiving is associated with worse mental and physical health, yet little research has investigated how publicly funded home care might ameliorate these harms. Objective To investigate the association between Medicaid home care services and family caregivers' health. Design, Setting, and Participants This longitudinal cohort study used data from the 1996 to 2017 Medical Expenditures Panel Survey. Data on all household members were collected in 5 interviews over 2 years. Person-level difference-in-difference models were used to isolate within-person changes associated with new onset of Medicaid home care. The Medical Expenditures Panel Survey longitudinal data sets included 331 202 individuals (approximately 10% excluded owing to loss to follow-up). Adult (age >= 21 years) members of households that contained at least 1 person with limited activities of daily living were included in our study. The analysis itself was performed from March to August of 2020. Exposures New onset of regular (>= 1 time per month) Medicaid home care in the household. Main Outcomes and Measures Self-rated mental and physical health (planned prior to beginning the study). Results The study population was 14 013 adults; 7232 were likely caregivers, or nondisabled adult coresidents of someone with activities of daily living limitations. Overall, 962 likely caregivers were ever exposed to Medicaid home care in the household; for 563, we observed the onset. Of likely caregivers exposed to Medicaid home care, 479 (50%) were women; 296 (31%) were White non-Hispanic, 309 (31%) were Hispanic or Latinx, and 279 (29%) were Black non-Hispanic individuals, respectively; 326 (34%) had less than a high school education; and 300 (31%) were in or near poverty. Median age of participants was 51 (interquartile range, 39-62) years. New-onset Medicaid home care was associated with a 0.08 standard deviation improvement in likely caregivers' self-rated mental health (95% CI, 0.01-0.14; P = .02) measured 1 to 6 months after onset, equivalent to a 3.39% improvement (95% CI, 0.05%-6.33%) over their average preonset mental health. No association with self-rated physical health was found (<0.001 standard deviations; 95% CI, -0.06 to 0.06; P = .99). Conclusions and Relevance In this cohort study, Medicaid home care was associated with improvement in caregiver self-rated mental health, but not with any short-term change in self-rated physical health. When evaluating the social value of home care programs, policy makers should consider spillover benefits to caregivers. Question How does family caregivers' health change when the person they care for begins to receive Medicaid home care services? Findings In this longitudinal cohort study, family caregivers' self-rated mental health improved significantly after their family member began receiving Medicaid home care services. Their self-rated physical health did not change. Meaning The findings of this longitudinal cohort study suggest that Medicaid home care programs may have spillover benefits, affecting not only their direct recipients but also those recipients' family caregivers. This cohort study examines the association between Medicaid home care services and family caregivers' health using data from the 1996 to 2017 Medical Expenditures Panel Survey.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据