4.0 Article

Isolation frequency and efficiency of mycoparasitic Pythium species in the West Mediterranean region of Turkey

期刊

CURRENT RESEARCH IN BIOTECHNOLOGY
卷 3, 期 -, 页码 14-20

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.crbiot.2021.01.002

关键词

Antifungal activity; Biocontrol; Dual culture; Identification; Oomycetes; Soil-borne plant pathogens

资金

  1. Scientific Research Projects Coordination Unite of Suleyman Demirel University, Isparta, Turkey

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A total of 132 mycoparasitic Pythium isolates were obtained from various agricultural fields in the West Mediterranean region of Turkey, with P. amasculinum and P. lycopersicum being the most commonly isolated species, mainly from sugarbeet fields. The study showed that these mycoparasitic species exhibit high mycoparasitic activity against Botrytis cinerea and Rhizoctonia solani, but are resistant to Sclerotinia rolfsii. This suggests that mycoparasitic Pythium species can be effective biocontrol agents against B. cinerea and R. solani.
A total of 132 mycoparasitic Pythium isolates were obtained from the soil samples taken from fruit orchards, vegetable fields, carnation greenhouses, sugarbeet fields and cereal fields in the West Mediterranean region of Turkey. The Oomycetes were isolated by using; surface soil dilution plate, sclerotia bait and precolonised plate methods. Isolates were identified as P. acanthophoron, P. amasculinum, P. lycopersicum, P. oligandrum, P. periplocum and P. paroecandrum, according to their morphological and molecular characteristics. The most commonly isolated mycoparasitic species were P. amasculinum and P. lycopersicum. The majority of the mycoparasites came from soil samples taken from the sugarbeet growing areas. It was determined that all isolates showed high mycoparasitic activity against Botrytis cinerea and Rhizoctonia solani, however Sclerotinia rolfsii was resistant. It can be concluded that the mycoparasitic Pythium species can be used as biocontrol agents against B. cinerea and R. solani.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据