4.2 Article

Managing Cancer And Living Meaningfully (CALM): randomised feasibility trial in patients with advanced cancer

期刊

BMJ SUPPORTIVE & PALLIATIVE CARE
卷 9, 期 2, 页码 209-218

出版社

BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1136/bmjspcare-2015-000866

关键词

-

资金

  1. University Health Network Department of Psychiatry
  2. Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) [MOP 106473]
  3. Princess Margaret Cancer Foundation Hertz Centre, Kirchmann and Kirsh Family Funds
  4. Campbell Family Cancer Research Institute
  5. Ontario Cancer Institute at the Princess Margaret Cancer Centre
  6. Ontario Ministry of Health and Long Term Care (OMOHLTC)
  7. University of Toronto/University Health Network Harold and Shirley Lederman Chair in Psychosocial Oncology and Palliative Care

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background Managing Cancer And Living Meaningfully (CALM) is a brief individual psychotherapy for patients with advanced cancer. In an intervention-only phase 2a trial, CALM showed promising results, leading to the present 2b pilot, which introduces procedures for randomisation and improved rigour in preparation for a phase 3 randomised controlled trial (RCT). Aims To test trial methodology and assess feasibility of a confirmatory RCT. Design A parallel-arm RCT (intervention vs usual care) with 3 and 6-month follow-ups. Assessment of feasibility included rates of consent, randomisation, attrition, intervention non-compliance and usual care contamination. Primary outcome: depressive symptoms (Patient Health Questionnaire-9; PHQ-9). Secondary outcomes: major depressive disorder (MDD), generalised anxiety, death anxiety, spiritual well-being, attachment anxiety and avoidance, self-esteem, experiential avoidance, quality of life and post-traumatic growth. Bayesian conjugate analysis was used in this low-powered setting. Setting/participants 60 adult patients with advanced cancer from the Princess Margaret Cancer Centre. Results Rate of consent was 32%, randomisation 78%, attrition 25%, non-compliance 37% and contamination 17%. There was support for potential treatment effects on: PHQ-9, OR=1.48, 95% Credible Interval (CRI. 95) (0.65, 3.38); MDD, OR=1.56, CRI. 95 (0.50, 4.84); attachment anxiety, OR=1.72, CRI. 95 (0.73, 4.03); and attachment avoidance, OR=1.58, CRI. 95 (0.67, 3.71). There was no support for effects on the seven remaining secondary outcomes. Conclusions A phase 3 CALM RCT is feasible and should aim to detect effect sizes of d=0.40, with greater attention to issues of compliance and contamination.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据