3.8 Article

Effect of selenium on alleviating oxidative stress in pea leaves caused by pea aphid feeding

期刊

JOURNAL OF PLANT PROTECTION RESEARCH
卷 61, 期 1, 页码 83-94

出版社

INST OCHRONY ROSLIN, PANSTWOWY INST BADAWCZY
DOI: 10.24425/jppr.2021.136272

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study evaluated the antioxidant effect of selenium on Pisum sativum L. plants pre-treated with sodium selenite or sodium selenate at different concentrations, followed by colonization by pea aphid Acyrthosiphon pisum (Harris). Results showed that selenium at low concentrations can alleviate oxidative stress caused by aphid feeding on pea leaves. The effects of selenium on reactive oxygen species levels, antioxidant enzyme activities, and total antioxidant capacity in pea leaves were dependent on the form and concentration of selenium, as well as the time after aphid colonization.
The aim of this study was to evaluate the antioxidant effect of selenium in Pisum sativum L. plants pre-treated with sodium selenite or sodium selenate at a concentration of 10 and 20 mu M, and then colonized by pea aphid Acyrthosiphon pisum (Harris). It has been hypothesized that selenium at low concentrations alleviates oxidative stress caused by aphid feeding on pea leaves. The study focused on the generation of reactive oxygen species (superoxide anion, hydrogen peroxide and hydroxyl radical), the activities of the antioxidant enzymes (superoxide dismutase and ascorbate peroxidase) scavenging the reactive oxygen species levels, as well as on total antioxidant activity in pea leaves. Selenium in pea leaves exposed to aphid feeding affected changes in the levels of reactive oxygen species, the activity of studied antioxidant enzymes, and the total antioxidant capacity. Effects depended on the form and concentration of selenium, as well as on the time after the colonization of pea plants by aphids. Obtained results showed beneficial effects of selenium in alleviating oxidative stress in pea leaves caused by aphid feeding.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据