4.2 Review

Depenalization, diversion and decriminalization: A realist review and programme theory of alternatives to criminalization for simple drug possession

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CRIMINOLOGY
卷 19, 期 1, 页码 29-54

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/1477370819887514

关键词

Drugs; depenalization; diversion; decriminalization; realist review; programme theory

资金

  1. Department of Justice and Equality
  2. Department of Health of the Republic of Ireland
  3. National Drug and Alcohol Research Centre at the University of New South Wales - Australian Government

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Policy makers are increasingly interested in alternatives to criminalization for the possession of illicit drugs, but there is currently no theoretically based and empirically tested framework to guide development and evaluation. This article presents a realist programme theory of alternative measures, based on a review of literature from nine countries. The study shows how different measures interact with social conditions and institutional contexts, triggering mechanisms across three causal pathways. It concludes that specific combinations of contexts, mechanisms, and outcomes can reduce harms without increasing drug use or related health and crime harms.
Alternatives to criminalization for the simple possession of illicit drugs are increasingly of interest to policy makers. But there is no existing theoretically based, empirically tested framework that can inform development and evaluation. This article presents a realist programme theory of such alternatives. It bases this on a realist review, which followed the Realist and Meta-narrative Evidence Syntheses: Evolving Standards (RAMESES). It describes the systematic process of searching the literature in English on nine relevant countries (Australia, Czech Republic, Denmark, Germany, Jamaica, Netherland, Portugal, the UK, the USA) for information on alternative measures in three categories: depenalization; diversion; and decriminalization. It shows how these measures - in theory and in practice - combine with pre-existing social conditions and institutional contexts to trigger mechanisms across three causal pathways (normative; criminal justice; and health and social services). It shows how some posited causal processes are more empirically supported than others. Alternative measures can reduce harms imposed by criminal justice processes without increasing drug use or related health and crime harms, but this depends on specific combinations of contexts, mechanisms and outcomes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据