4.2 Article

The Attitudes-Behaviors Corrective (ABC) Model of Violent Extremism

期刊

TERRORISM AND POLITICAL VIOLENCE
卷 34, 期 3, 页码 425-450

出版社

ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/09546553.2019.1699793

关键词

Violent extremism; terrorism; radicalization; deradicalization; disengagement

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This article introduces the Attitudes-Behaviors Corrective (ABC) model as a solution to the conceptualization issues in understanding and responding to terrorism and violent extremism. The model focuses on the connection between attitudes and behaviors and provides a classification system for the drivers of violent extremism, offering practical tools for research and countermeasures.
Progress in understanding and responding to terrorism and violent extremism has continued to stall in part because we often fail to adequately conceptualize the problem. Perhaps most notably, much of our terminology (for instance, radicalization) and many variants of our existing models and analogies (including conveyor belts, staircases and pyramids) conflate sympathy for this violence with involvement in its creation. As its name suggests, the Attitudes-Behaviors Corrective (ABC) model seeks to overcome this issue by placing this key disconnect between attitudes and behaviors at its core. In this paper, we first present the key elements of our model, which include a graphic representation of this disconnect and a classification system of the drivers of violent extremism. The former enables us to track the trajectories of individuals in relation to both their attitudes and behaviors, while the latter helps ensure that we consider all potential explanations for these movements. We then adapt these elements to focus on exit from violence, applying the dual concepts of disengagement and deradicalization. Finally, we conclude with a section that aims to provide the research community and those tasked with preventing and countering violent extremism with practical benefits from the ABC model.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据