4.3 Article

Applying blended synchronous teaching and learning for flexible learning in higher education: an action research study at a university in Hong Kong

期刊

ASIA PACIFIC JOURNAL OF EDUCATION
卷 42, 期 2, 页码 211-227

出版社

ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/02188791.2020.1766417

关键词

Blended synchronous learning; flexible learning; higher education; online learning; active research

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study proposes an alternative blended teaching and learning approach to address practical challenges faced by university students in pursuing flexible and global learning. Using action research, the effects of blended synchronous teaching and learning were improved, with positive ratings from students.
Due to the challenges of all-round development, higher-education students are increasingly demanding more flexible learning that goes beyond the on-campus/online dichotomy. However, university students miss learning opportunities because of the conflict of time and space. Blended learning is an effective way to create more learning opportunities and support university students' flexible learning, but its implementation varies across contexts. This study proposed an alternative blended teaching and learning approach to solve practical problems defined in the context of a traditional classroom in a university in Hong Kong when students pursue flexible learning and global learning. A three-round action research approach was used to improve the effects of blended synchronous teaching and learning. Data collection and analysis in each round showed that the students positively rated the implementation of blended learning according to their needs, the quality of the technologies adopted, and the benefits gained. This blended synchronous teaching and learning mode was structured based on the implementation of different actions in three rounds, bridging the gap between research and practice in blended synchronous learning.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据