4.6 Article

Multidimensional Poverty Index with Dependence-Based Weights

期刊

SOCIAL INDICATORS RESEARCH
卷 161, 期 2-3, 页码 843-872

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11205-020-02412-w

关键词

Multidimensional poverty index; Dependence-based weighting; Copula function; Copula-based rank dependence

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper proposes a new multidimensional poverty index that takes into account the dependence among indicators and introduces an innovative weighting approach. The study on selected European countries reveals that multidimensional poverty is influenced not only by individual shortfalls, but also by the level of interdependence among well-being indicators.
An important aspect of the multidimensional perception of poverty phenomenon is the dependence among the underlying indicators. However, the commonly applied approaches to multidimensional poverty assessment do not capture this interdependence. In this paper we propose a new multidimensional poverty index accounting for the dependence and innovate over the weighting approach. The weighting method proposed here incorporates the copula-based rank dependence among well-being dimensions and contains necessary normative parameters. In particular, the latter includes the elasticity of substitution among dimensions and the belief-adjusting parameter, which specifies the direction of relation between the dependence and the weights. The results of poverty evaluation in the selected European countries suggest that multidimensional poverty is driven not only by the individual shortfalls, but also by the degree of interdependence among well-being indicators. Moreover, multidimensional poverty is relatively higher, if dimensional weights are in direct proportion to the dependence compared to the cases of inverse relation and equal weighting. Considering the novel weighting approach, this paper contributes to the literature on composite indicators by suggesting a channel to enclose the dependence structure in the multidimensional poverty index.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据