4.2 Article

Effects of the MINDSTRONG© CBT-based program on depression, anxiety and healthy lifestyle behaviors in graduate health sciences students

期刊

JOURNAL OF AMERICAN COLLEGE HEALTH
卷 70, 期 4, 页码 1001-1009

出版社

ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/07448481.2020.1782922

关键词

Depression; anxiety; college students; cognitive-behavior therapy; lifestyle behaviors

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study evaluated the effects of the MINDSTRONG(C) cognitive-behavioral skills building program on mental health outcomes and lifestyle behaviors of graduate students. The results showed that students receiving the program reported lower levels of depression/anxiety and healthier lifestyle behaviors, particularly those with higher baseline levels of depression/anxiety. This suggests that the MINDSTRONG(C) program can be used as a preventive and early intervention tool.
Objective To evaluate effects of the MINDSTRONG(C)cognitive-behavioral skills building program versus an attention control program on mental health outcomes and lifestyle behaviors of graduate health professional students.Participants:201 entering graduate students from seven health sciences colleges at a public land grant University in the U.S. Midwest.Methods:A randomized controlled trial was conducted with three-month follow-up. Valid and reliable instruments measured depression, anxiety, stress, healthy lifestyle beliefs and healthy lifestyle behaviors.Results:Students receiving MINDSTRONG(C)reported less depression/anxiety and healthier lifestyle behaviors than those receiving the control program. Students with elevated levels of depression/anxiety at baseline demonstrated greater benefits from the program.Conclusions:MINDSTRONG(C)can be used as a preventive and early intervention for improving mental health outcomes and lifestyle behaviors in graduate students. Because the program can be delivered by trained non-mental health professionals, it has the potential to be widely scaled on campuses throughout the U.S.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据