4.6 Article

Examining students' behavior towards campus security preparedness exercise: The role of perceived risk within the theory of planned behavior

期刊

CURRENT PSYCHOLOGY
卷 41, 期 7, 页码 4358-4367

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s12144-020-00951-6

关键词

Campus security; Theory of planned behavior; Perceived risk; Attitude; Participation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigates the determinants of intention and actual participation in campus security preparedness exercise (CSPE) using the theory of planned behavior (TPB). The findings suggest that TPB is a predictive model for explaining CSPE participation. The study provides a theoretical platform for interventions to promote active participation in CSPE.
Participating in campus security preparedness exercise (CSPE) is vitally important in addressing potential security threats and preventing critical incidents. The present study investigates the various determinants to predict intention, and actual participation in CSPE using the theory of planned behavior (TPB). We also examined the effect of perceived risk on attitude as an extension of the TPB. Based on 441 valid responses collected from students studying in different institutions of higher learning in Malaysia, the partial least squares equation modeling (PLS-SEM) was used to analyze actual participation in CSPE behavior. The findings suggest that TPB is, indeed, a predictive model for explaining participation in CSPE. Based on the findings, the correlation between perceived risk and attitude is insignificant which leads to our subsequent argument on attitude as autonomous and not affected by one's perceived risk. Nevertheless, the proposed direct relationship between perceived behavioral control (PBC) and intention behavior is not supported. These findings provide an important theoretical platform for new interventions to further promoting active participation in CSPE. Policy implications for improving CSPE behaviors are provided accordingly.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据