4.5 Article

Tourists' Willingness to Pay for holiday trip characteristics: A Discrete Choice Experiment

期刊

TOURISM ECONOMICS
卷 28, 期 2, 页码 349-370

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/1354816620959901

关键词

Discrete Choice Experiment; Latent Class Model; travel preferences; vacation choice; Willingness to Pay

资金

  1. Spanish Ministry of Education, Culture and Sport [FPU 16/00031]
  2. FEDER/Ministry of Science, Innovation and Universities [ECO2017-82111-R]
  3. Basque Government [IT1359-19]
  4. Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness [MINECO-18-ECO2017-86402-C2-1-R]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This article investigates the marginal rates of substitution and Willingness to Pay for holiday trip characteristics. It uses a Discrete Choice Experiment to examine individuals' preferences and payment preferences for various aspects of a holiday trip. The results demonstrate that respondents value plane travel, high-quality accommodation, and longer stays. Additionally, the study explores the welfare loss caused by a tourism daily tax, finding that coastal destinations experience a greater loss.
This article studies the marginal rates of substitution and Willingness to Pay for holiday trip characteristics. Using a Discrete Choice Experiment, we examine how much individuals from four cities in Northern Spain are willing to pay for accommodation, mode of transport, travel time and length of stay. We estimate a Latent Class Model that accounts for taste heterogeneity based on sociodemographic characteristics. The welfare loss due to a tourism daily tax is also examined. Our results show that respondents place positive utility to travelling by plane, high-quality accommodation and longer stays. Specifically, they are willing to pay euro170 more for plane travelling with respect to the use of car, euro120 for staying at a four-star hotel relative to an apartment and euro760 for a 10-day trip relative to a 3-day one. A daily tax of euro1 per person would produce a larger welfare loss in coastal destinations.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据