4.3 Article

Digital stories for transition: co-constructing an evidence base in the early years with autistic children, families and practitioners

期刊

EDUCATIONAL REVIEW
卷 74, 期 6, 页码 1063-1081

出版社

ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/00131911.2020.1816909

关键词

Praxeology; close-to-practice; co-construction; early years; autism

资金

  1. The Froebel Trust
  2. Public Engagement with Research unit (PERu), University of Southampton

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Concerns have been raised about the quality of practice-focused research in education, particularly in early years education. This paper introduces a praxeological framework for research that emphasizes praxis, power, values, and methodology, and demonstrates its application in a research-practice partnership focused on autism education. By utilizing a non-orthodox Digital Storytelling methodology, the researchers, practitioners, children, and families were able to co-construct knowledge about educational transitions, leading to new insights into educational practices. The authors suggest that explicitly including a pathway to impact within a praxeological framing of research can further enhance its effectiveness.
Concerns have been raised about the quality of practice-focused research in education generally and in early years education specifically. Chris Pascal and Tony Bertram argue that a shift in worldview is needed to improve the robustness and overall quality of participatory research in the early years and proposed a praxeological framework for research comprising praxis, power, values, and methodology. This paper provides an example of how this praxeological framework was applied within an existing research-practice partnership focusing on autism education in the early years. We used a non-orthodox Digital Storytelling methodology to co-construct knowledge between researchers, practitioners, children and families about educational transitions. Our co-construction of knowledge involved the embodied knowledge of children and the exemplary (practical) knowledge of families and practitioners, leading to new insights into educational practices. In adopting a knowledge co-creation approach from the start, we established a powerful pathway to impact through which our research is already making a difference to practice. We propose that pathway to impact is an important element that could be made more explicit within a praxeological framing of research.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据