4.3 Review

Digital competences for teacher professional development. Systematic review

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF TEACHER EDUCATION
卷 45, 期 4, 页码 513-531

出版社

ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/02619768.2020.1827389

关键词

Digital competences; educational innovations; professional development; teaching methods; systematic review

资金

  1. Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness within the State Plan for the Promotion of Scientific and Technical Excellence Research [DIFOTICYD EDU2016 75232-P]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Information and Communication Technologies have played a significant role in improving quality of life, but their potential in education is still developing. This study provides a systematic review of the literature on digital competencies and teacher professional development, identifying research trends and potential directions for future studies. The findings highlight the lack of teacher training and insufficient ICT training as challenges in this field.
Over the last years, Information and Communication Technologies have played a substantial role in improving both the quality of life for people. However, their potential in education is still developing. In this regard, this paper provides a systematic review of the literature on digital competencies and teacher professional development from 2008 to 2018. The purpose of this study is identifying research trends and potential directions on this topic for future research. The method followed is based on the PRISMA Statement Guidelines for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis. After applying criteria of inclusion, exclusion and thematic belonging, in Scopus and Wos databases, the sample was constituted in 21 studies. The selected studies emphasise the importance of digital competence as one of the challenges facing teachers today, being mainly qualitative methodology studies. Among the conclusions we highlight that most of the selected studies reveal a lack of teacher training and insufficient ICT training.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据