4.4 Article

Linking Organizational Virtuousness, Engagement, and Organizational Citizenship Behavior: The Moderating Role of Individual and Organizational Factors

期刊

JOURNAL OF HOSPITALITY & TOURISM RESEARCH
卷 46, 期 5, 页码 879-904

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/1096348020963701

关键词

organizational virtuousness; engagement; organizational citizenship behavior; proactive personality; organizational support

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study finds that managers can increase employees' engagement by improving their perception of organizational virtuousness. Increased engagement leads to better organizational citizenship behavior. Furthermore, employees with proactive personality or favorable perception of organizational support experience a stronger impact of organizational virtuousness on their work engagement.
This study examines the effect of organizational virtuousness on employees' engagement and organizational citizenship behavior in a deluxe hotel. It also verifies the moderating role of a positive personality at the individual level and the perception of organizational support at the organizational level in this causal relationship. The sample consists of 353 employees of a deluxe hotel in South Korea. The finding showed that managers can increase employees' engagement without fail by improving their perception of organizational virtuousness. Employees' engagement can increase organizational citizenship behavior, and the perception of organizational virtuousness can be linked to better organizational citizenship behavior, as it increases engagement. In addition, the more employees have proactive personality or favorable perception of organizational support, the more the effect of organizational virtuousness on work engagement increased. This result demonstrates the fact that improving employees' perception of organizational virtuousness is a way of increasing employees' work engagement and organizational citizenship behavior from managers' perspective.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据