4.5 Review

Critical review of data-driven decision-making in bridge operation and maintenance

期刊

STRUCTURE AND INFRASTRUCTURE ENGINEERING
卷 18, 期 1, 页码 47-70

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/15732479.2020.1833946

关键词

Data collection; data-driven bridge maintenance; data management; data sharing; data storage; decision-making; structure evaluation

资金

  1. Australian Research Council (ARC) [DP170104613]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study provides a detailed investigation into current data-driven bridge O&M decision-making, including mainstream data types, data management issues, and typical application areas. Challenges to implementing data-driven bridge O&M decision-making are identified, such as the lack of standard data needs and integration.
Bridges are critical infrastructure, and effective operation and maintenance (O&M) is essential for ensuring the good condition of bridges. Owing to the increasing complexity of modern bridges and the availability of information technologies (e.g. sensors, laser scanners, and ultrasonic radar) for the collection of massive data, bridge O&M and decision-making gradually shift toward a data-driven manner. However, both the bridge industry and the academia still do not have a common understanding of the latest progress, challenges, and trends of data-driven bridge O&M decision-making. Thus, through a critical review of 485 articles, this paper investigates current data-driven bridge O&M decision-making in detail, including mainstream data types, issues related to data management, and typical application areas using these data. Challenges to implement data-driven bridge O&M decision-making are identified, such as lack of standard data needs, lack of data integration, and lack of standard procedures. Future research opportunities to address the challenges are proposed. This paper can help bridge O&M teams by identifying suitable data and applications to make informed decisions that align well with their needs meanwhile serve as a basis for future research efforts in this area.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据