4.6 Article

Measurement of Individual Investor Sentiment and Its Application: Evidence from Chinese Stock Message Board

期刊

EMERGING MARKETS FINANCE AND TRADE
卷 58, 期 3, 页码 681-691

出版社

ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/1540496X.2020.1835637

关键词

individual investor sentiment; SO-LNPMI algorithm; market returns; market volatility

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of P. R. China [71471020, 71850008]
  2. Hunan Provincial Natural Science Foundation [2019JJ50650]
  3. Scientific Research Fund of Hunan Provincial Education Department [18C0221]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper investigates the relationship between individual investor sentiment in Chinese stock message board Guba Eastmoney and market returns and volatility. The authors propose a novel sentiment measurement algorithm called SO-LNPMI and demonstrate that it has higher accuracy and better adaptive property compared to traditional methods. The study finds that negative sentiment is negatively correlated with market returns, while positive sentiment does not have a statistically significant impact on market returns. Additionally, positive (negative) sentiment is negatively (positively) correlated with market volatility. These findings are robust across various tests.
This paper investigates individual investor sentiment in Chinese stock message board Guba Eastmoney and its relation to the market returns and volatility. Focusing on measuring the sentiment, we propose a novel algorithm Semantic Orientation from Laplace Smoothed Normalized Pointwise Mutual Information(SO-LNPMI). We show that: (i) comparing to traditional methods, SO-LNPMI has higher accuracy and better adaptive property of probability estimate; (ii) negative sentiment is negatively correlated with market returns, whereas positive sentiment does not have any statistically significant impact on market returns; (iii) positive(negative) sentiment is negatively(positively) correlated with market volatility. Our results survive a range of robustness tests.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据