4.6 Article

Students' motivation and engagement in higher education: the importance of attitude to online learning

期刊

HIGHER EDUCATION
卷 83, 期 2, 页码 317-338

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10734-020-00657-5

关键词

Student engagement; Motivation; Higher education; Attitude to online learning; Study mode

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The design of online learning environments can influence students' learning experiences and play an important role in enhancing motivation and educational engagement. However, attitude toward online learning does not affect the relationship between intrinsic motivation and engagement.
The emergence of online environments has changed the landscape of educational learning. Some students thrive in this learning environment, but others become amotivated and disengaged. Drawing on self-determination theory, we report the findings of a study of 574 undergraduate business students at an Australian higher education institution on their attitude toward online learning, and its impact on their motivation and educational engagement. Data was collected via an e-mail survey and analysed using structural equation modelling and the Hayes' bootstrapping method. The results of the study were mixed. Attitude to online learning mediated the relationships of both intrinsic motivation to know and extrinsic motivation with engagement, indicating that the design of online learning environments can play a role in enhancing learning experiences. However, attitude to online learning was not found to mediate the intrinsic motivation to accomplish and engagement relationship. A negative mediation effect was partially supported between amotivation and engagement, with study mode found as a moderated mediator to this effect, being stronger and significant for online students as opposed to on-campus students. These results have implications for how students can be engaged online, and the need for educators to design online learning environments that support the learning experience for all students.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据