4.3 Review

Mixed Methods Research in Criminology and Criminal Justice: a Systematic Review

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE
卷 47, 期 3, 页码 526-546

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s12103-020-09593-7

关键词

Mixed methods; Methodology; Criminal justice; Criminology

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Research in the field of criminology and criminal justice often utilizes quantitative or qualitative methodologies, with a recent increase in the use of mixed methods designs. A systematic review found that most mixed method research in this field is conducted in the specialty area of victimology, and that there is a lack of methodological concepts specific to mixed methods research in many publications. Recommendations are offered to advance mixed methods research in criminology and criminal justice.
The field of criminology and criminal justice encompass broad and complex multidisciplinary topics. Most of the research that falls under these areas uses either quantitative or qualitative methodologies, with historically limited use of mixed methods designs. Research utilizing mixed methods has increased within the social sciences in recent years, including a steadily growing body of mixed method research in criminal justice and criminology. The goal of this study was to examine how mixed method designs are being employed within research related to criminal justice and criminology. Our systematic review located 327 mixed method articles published between 2001 and 2017. Findings indicated most criminology and criminal justice research is being conducted within the specialty area of victimology. This study provides an overview of mixed methods research in criminology and criminal justice and also illustrates that most publications are not including methodological concepts specific to mixed methods research (e.g., integration). Along with our systematic review, we offer a series of recommendations to move mixed methods research forward in criminology and criminal justice.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据