4.3 Article

Orban's political jackpot: migration and the Hungarian electorate

期刊

JOURNAL OF ETHNIC AND MIGRATION STUDIES
卷 48, 期 2, 页码 405-424

出版社

ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/1369183X.2020.1853905

关键词

Migration; radicalisation; politicisation of immigration; public attitudes; Hungary

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper examines the Hungarian government's focus on immigration and its political impact, arguing that the center-right party successfully politicized the issue and acted as an agenda-setter rather than a follower. Analyzing data from various surveys, it shows how Hungarian voters' perceptions of immigration differ from European public opinion, and how fears related to immigration played a role in the 2018 parliamentary elections.
PM Viktor Orban's government in Hungary is often seen as one of the paradigmatic cases of illiberalism and an intense contestation of immigration. This paper argues that the Hungarian government's strong focus on immigration and its hardline positions on the issue proved to be a political jackpot for the governing party. Besides presenting the claims and frames Fidesz has used regarding migration since 2015, three analytical aspects are covered in this article, based on Eurobarometer, European Social Survey and Hungarian domestic polling data. First, the trends in the perception of the importance of migration for the Hungarian voters are compared to the European public opinion. Second, the changes in the attitudes of Hungarians to immigration are also analysed in European comparison. Third, I also present what role the fears related to immigration played at the 2018 parliamentary elections. On the whole, the Hungarian centre-right successfully politicised the issue of migration, and acted as an agenda-setter rather than a follower. It was able to sustain a sense of crisis between 2015 and 2018; it exacerbated the rejection of immigration in society; and it was successful in entrenching migration as one of the top fears among its potential voters.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据