4.4 Article

The match between business model design and knowledge base in firm growth: from a knowledge-based view

期刊

出版社

ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/09537325.2021.1890011

关键词

Business model design; knowledge breadth; knowledge depth; firm growth

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [71902039, 71572204]
  2. Philosophy and Social Sciences Planning of Guangdong Province [GD19CGL24]
  3. Major Scientific Research Projects of Guangdong Universities [2017GWTSCX028]
  4. Guangdong Provincial Key Platforms and Scientific Research Projects of Universities [2018WQNCX021]
  5. Philosophy and Social Science Planning of Guangzhou [2018GZGJ198]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This research examines the impact of knowledge change and reorganisation on the success of business model (BM) design, and finds that efficiency-centered BM design benefits more from a deep knowledge base, while novelty-centered BM design benefits from both broad and deep knowledge bases. These results offer new empirical evidence on the contingency effects of knowledge base on the effectiveness of BM design for firm growth.
Effective knowledge change and reorganisation are important factors in the success of business model (BM) design. However, the existing literature has rarely focused on investigating the suitable match between the existing knowledge base and BM design. Building on the knowledge-based view (KBV), this research analyzes the effects of efficiency- and novelty-centered BM designs on firm growth, which will be differently moderated by the knowledge factors of breadth and depth. With the empirical examination of 290 Chinese enterprises, we found that to foster firm growth, efficiency-centered BM design benefits more from a deep knowledge base than from a broad knowledge base, whereas novelty-centered BM design benefits from both. The above results provide new empirical evidence for understanding the contingency effects of knowledge base on the effectiveness of BM design for firm growth.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据