4.3 Article

The centre no longer holds: the Lega, Matteo Salvini and the remaking of Italian immigration politics

期刊

JOURNAL OF ETHNIC AND MIGRATION STUDIES
卷 48, 期 2, 页码 441-460

出版社

ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/1369183X.2020.1853907

关键词

Italy; European Union; migration crisis; Salvini; Lega; issue salience; policy drift

资金

  1. Vetenskapsradet [2019-00504]
  2. Forte [2019-00504] Funding Source: Forte
  3. Swedish Research Council [2019-00504] Funding Source: Swedish Research Council

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study finds that policy responses to migration in Italy have been shaped by issue salience and changing configurations on the centre right of Italian party politics. The increased politicisation of 'irregular' arrivals after 2015 significantly advantaged the Lega, who transformed into a populist radical right party and dominated the nominal 'centre-right' coalition. The imposition of prevention and removal policies for migrants by the Lega during their time in government conformed to theoretical expectations regarding the role of interest groups and public opinion in public policy.
This article asks how policy responses to migration in Italy have been shaped both by issue salience and by changing configurations on the centre right of Italian party politics both prior to and following the 2015 'migration crisis'. We show that, first, the increased politicisation of 'irregular' arrivals into Italy after 2015 changed migration from a relatively 'quiet' policy issue to one of 'loud' politics meaning that it was highly salient to the public. This salience significantly advantaged the Lega, who by this point had already transformed into an archetypal, European populist radical right party, but could now campaign successfully nationally and dominate the nominal 'centre-right' coalition. Second, the imposition when in government between June 2018 and September 2019 by the Lega of policies for migrants and asylum-seekers that focussed solely on prevention and removal and ended what remained of prior policy drift. We show that both trends conform to theoretical expectations regarding the relative power of interest groups and public opinion over public policy that are contingent on public issue salience, which we show to be the most plausible determinant of variation in migration policy, rather than public attitudes or party positions, during the period.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据