The Myth of Non-interference: Chinese Foreign Policy in Cambodia

The discourse of non-interference features prominently in China's so-called peaceful rise and win - win approach to international diplomacy. This article contests Beijing's non-interference rhetoric through a case-study analysis of Cambodia. We make two core arguments: first, interference by foreign powers is not limited to actions that challenge a regime's leadership, but can also include the reinforcement of regimes that lack popular support. Second, Beijing's non-interference rhetoric is not demonstrated in the context of Cambodia, where it has repeatedly interfered to reinforce Prime Minister Hun Sen's leadership during times of political contestation. To make these arguments, the article offers a historical summary of Chinese interference in Cambodia followed by an analysis of the key domains in which Hun Sen's regime supports Chinese geostrategic interests. These are: support for Beijing's One China Policy and its Belt and Road Initiative; support for Beijing in negotiations with ASEAN; and support for Chinese economic interests. Collectively, we argue that these domains contribute to the advancement of China's core national interest, and it is therefore a myth to suggest that China has not interfered in Cambodia's domestic politics.

Automated summary

This article challenges Beijing's non-interference rhetoric through a case study of Cambodia and makes two core arguments: foreign interference can involve reinforcing regimes lacking popular support, not just challenging leadership, and Beijing has interfered in Cambodia to support Prime Minister Hun Sen during times of political contestation. The article argues that Beijing's actions in Cambodia, which advance Chinese national interests, contradict the notion of non-interference.