4.3 Article

Experiences of Intimate Partner Violence during Lockdown and the COVID-19 Pandemic

期刊

JOURNAL OF FAMILY VIOLENCE
卷 37, 期 6, 页码 969-977

出版社

SPRINGER/PLENUM PUBLISHERS
DOI: 10.1007/s10896-021-00260-x

关键词

COVID-19; Domestic violence; Intimate partner violence; Online forum; Partner abuse; Pandemic

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The COVID-19 pandemic has had a substantial impact on IPV victims, often leading to an escalation in the severity of violence experienced. Victims reported experiences such as abusers using COVID-19 as a tool, disruptions in services, preparation to leave, and factors that increase abuse or distress. These experiences during the pandemic are crucial for informing interventions and providing guidance and support to IPV victims during crises.
Previous studies have demonstrated that there is an increase in Intimate Partner Violence (IPV) during times of crisis (e.g., financial, environmental, or socio-political situations). The COVID-19 pandemic has triggered an unprecedented global health and financial tragedy, but research is yet to establish exactly how the situation may impact on IPV. The present study investigates victims' experience of IPV during lockdown and the COVID-19 pandemic. We report a qualitative thematic analysis of 50 discussion forum posts written by victims of IPV. Of these, 48 forum posts were written by female victims of male perpetrated violence. All forum posts were obtained from the popular online platform, Reddit. We identified four themes associated with IPV victims' experiences during lockdown and the global pandemic: (i) Use of COVID-19 by the Abuser, (ii) Service Disruption, (iii) Preparation to Leave, and (iv) Factors Increasing Abuse or Distress. The COVID-19 pandemic has had a substantial impact on those living with IPV, often increasing the severity of IPV experienced. The experiences of those affected by IPV during this period inform interventions and the guidance and support provided to IPV victims during times of crisis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据