4.0 Article

Working from home during COVID-19 crisis: a cyber security culture assessment survey

期刊

SECURITY JOURNAL
卷 35, 期 2, 页码 486-505

出版社

PALGRAVE MACMILLAN LTD
DOI: 10.1057/s41284-021-00286-2

关键词

Cyber security culture; Assessment; COVID-19 pandemic; Remote working

资金

  1. European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation program under the EnergyShield project Integrated Cyber security Solution for the Vulnerability Assessment, Monitoring and Protection of Critical Energy Infrastructures [832907]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study evaluates the cyber security culture readiness of organizations from different countries and business domains during the COVID-19 crisis. Findings highlight the importance of addressing information security readiness and resilience of both individuals and organizations, while also suggesting future scientific routes and research paths that need to be explored.
This paper aims to evaluate the cyber security culture readiness of organizations from different countries and business domains when teleworking became a necessity due to the COVID-19 crisis. We have designed a targeted questionnaire and conducted a web-based survey addressing employees while working from home during the COVID-19 spread over the globe. The questionnaire contained no more than 23 questions and was available for almost a month, from 7th April 2020 until 3rd May 2020. During that period, 264 participants from 13 European countries spent approximately 8 minutes to answer it. Gathered data were analyzed from different perspectives leading to evolutionary findings regarding information security readiness and resilience of both individuals and organizations. In this paper, results are being presented and discussed in detail while focusing on future scientific routes and research paths that need to be explored. It concludes on a number of cyber security recommendations addressing both the emerged vulnerabilities and the need for security culture evolution.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据