4.2 Article

Comprehensive Evaluation of the Functional Activities Questionnaire (FAQ) and Its Reliability and Validity

期刊

ASSESSMENT
卷 29, 期 4, 页码 748-763

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/1073191121991215

关键词

Functional Activities Questionnaire; FAQ; functioning; activities of daily living; ADLs; psychometrics; reliability; validity; item response theory; IRT

资金

  1. NIA/NIH [U01 AG016976]
  2. NIA [P30 AG019610, P30 AG013846, P30 AG062428-01, P50 AG008702, P50 AG025688, P50 AG047266, P30 AG010133, P50 AG005146, P30 AG062421-01, P30 AG062422-01]
  3. THE NIA [P50 AG005138, P30 AG008051, P30 AG013854, P30 AG008017, P30 AG010161, P50 AG047366, P30 AG010129, P50 AG016573, P30 AG062429-01, P50 AG023501]
  4. 'NIA' [P30 AG035982, P30 AG028383, P30 AG053760, P30 AG010124, P50 AG005133, P50 AG005142, P30 AG012300, P30 AG049638, P50 AG005136, P30 AG062715-01, P50 AG005681, P50 AG047270]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This article conducted comprehensive psychometric analyses on the Functional Activities Questionnaire (FAQ) using tools from generalizability and item response theories. Results showed that the FAQ is a reliable and valid measure of activities of daily living concerns for use in clinical/research settings.
The Functional Activities Questionnaire (FAQ) is a collateral-report measure of difficulties in activities of daily living. Despite its widespread use, psychometric analyses have been limited in scope, piecemeal across samples, and limited primarily to classical test theory. This article consolidated and expanded psychometric analyses using tools from generalizability and item response theories among 27,916 individuals from the National Alzheimer's Coordinating Center database who completed the FAQ. Reliability was evaluated with internal consistency, test-retest, and generalizability analyses. Validity was assessed via convergence with neurocognitive measures, classification accuracy with impairment stage, and confirmatory factor and item response theory analyses. Demographics did not impact scores and there was strong evidence for reliability (0.52-0.95), though coefficients were attenuated when restricted in range to diagnostic groups (e.g., normal cognition). There were strong correlations with neurocognitive measures (rs: -.30 to -.59), strong classification accuracy (areas under the curve: .81-.99), and a single-factor model had excellent fit. All items evidenced strong item response theory discrimination and provided significant information regarding functional disability, albeit within a relatively restricted range. The FAQ is a reliable and valid measure of activities of daily living concerns for use in clinical/research settings. It best assesses mild levels of functional difficulty, which is helpful in distinguishing normal cognition from mild cognitive impairment and dementia.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据