4.3 Article

Challenges, strategies and self-efficacy of teachers supporting autistic pupils in contrasting school settings: a qualitative study

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SPECIAL NEEDS EDUCATION
卷 37, 期 3, 页码 371-385

出版社

ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/08856257.2021.1878659

关键词

Autism; asd; inclusion; special education; teacher experiences; self-efficacy

资金

  1. Qube Learning

向作者/读者索取更多资源

There is general support among teachers for inclusion of children with special educational needs, but many lack the confidence and knowledge to support autistic pupils. Teachers from different school settings may have varied experiences and attitudes towards autistic pupils, highlighting the need for further research in this area.
There is general support among teachers for inclusion of children with special educational needs, but many lack the confidence and knowledge to support autistic pupils. This can have an adverse effect on their education. Previous studies have explored the attitudes of teachers towards inclusion, but less is known about the experiences of teachers from contrasting school settings regarding autistic pupils. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with twelve teachers from mainstream and special schools. Questions explored the school provision for autistic pupils, including strategies relating to their learning, friendships, bullying and general inclusion. Thematic analysis identified themes describing teachers' challenges supporting autistic children, strategies they adopt to facilitate achievement and the influence of factors such as staff training/expertise, educational ideology, attitudes and the physical environment. Overall, it is argued that, besides the structural differences between mainstream and special schools, there remain a number of additional factors impacting teachers' sense of self-efficacy. These are discussed in relation to recent research perspectives advocating an inclusive educational pedagogy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据