4.3 Article

Interpreting Past Human Diets Using Stable Isotope Mixing Models-Best Practices for Data Acquisition

期刊

JOURNAL OF ARCHAEOLOGICAL METHOD AND THEORY
卷 29, 期 1, 页码 138-161

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10816-021-09514-w

关键词

Stable isotopes; Palaeodietary reconstruction; Mixing models; Data acquisition

资金

  1. Agence Nationale de la Recherche [ANR-17-CE27-0023]
  2. Canada Research Chairs program
  3. Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR) [ANR-17-CE27-0023] Funding Source: Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study discusses the challenges faced by archaeologists in reconstructing palaeodiets using SIMMs, focusing on issues in data acquisition that could affect dietary quantification. A flowchart is provided to aid in sample selection for dietary reconstruction, aimed at reducing the likelihood of inaccurate outputs. The study also highlights areas where SIMMs may not be suitable for all archaeological contexts.
Using stable isotope mixing models (SIMMs) to quantify past diets is becoming increasingly common in archaeology. This study highlights important field-specific difficulties encountered by archaeologists in reconstructing palaeodiets using SIMMs. Focusing on the data acquisition stage, we discuss several issues that could confound dietary quantification if not accounted for. These issues are categorized under several broad categories: diagenesis, intra-individual variability, representativeness of both the consumers and sources, and other commonly encountered field-specific problems. We summarize these issues with a flow chart to help archaeologists to select the most appropriate samples for dietary reconstruction using SIMMs, thereby decreasing the probability that the outputs of the SIMM are inaccurate. We conclude by discussing the ways in which SIMMs may not be appropriate for all archaeological contexts, highlighting those areas that are likely to be the most problematic for end users.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据