4.3 Article

'Pinkwashing' the radical-right: Gender and the mainstreaming of radical-right policies and actions

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF POLITICAL RESEARCH
卷 61, 期 1, 页码 86-110

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/1475-6765.12442

关键词

gender; radical‐ right; stereotypes; Israel

资金

  1. program on democratic resilience and development (PDRD)
  2. Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung (KAS)
  3. Lauder School of Government, Diplomacy and Strategy Interdisciplinary Center (IDC) Herzliya

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Women's visibility in radical-right politics can positively impact the public acceptance and support of radical-right agendas, particularly among women. This is attributed to the fact that women in these roles are often perceived through feminine gender stereotypes, which can soften the image of radical-right parties and movements and make them more appealing to the general public.
Across the globe, women are increasingly more visible as leaders and activists in radical-right parties and movements. Does women's visibility in radical-right politics, both institutionalized and non-institutionalized, affect public acceptance of radical-right agendas? The present paper proposes a 'radical-right gender mainstreaming model', arguing that women in radical-right politics are perceived by the general public through a prism of feminine gender stereotypes, which counteract radical-right parties' and movements' masculine stereotypes, thus 'softening' their image and making them more acceptable to the general public. Across four experimental studies conducted in the Israeli context, we find strong evidence that women's visibility as radical-right parliamentary representatives (Studies 1a and 1b) and as radical-right political activists (Studies 2a and 2b) increases acceptance of and support for these parties' and movements' agenda, particularly among women. We further demonstrate that these effects are mediated by the attribution of feminine stereotypes (warmth) to women versus men political actors. Implications of these findings are discussed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据