4.2 Article

Double jeopardy: Minority stress and the influence of transgender identity and race/ethnicity

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TRANSGENDER HEALTH
卷 23, 期 1-2, 页码 133-148

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/26895269.2021.1890660

关键词

Ethnicity; intersectionality; minority stress; race; transgender

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study found no significant differences in gender-related discrimination and psychological distress between White and BIPOC transgender individuals in the sample, but some individual racial/ethnic groups reported significantly higher or lower scores. The results also indicate that changes in reported gender minority stress are positively correlated with reported psychological distress.
Background: Prior research suggests transgender individuals with multiple minority statuses experience higher psychological stress compared to their singly disadvantaged counterparts, and both Black, Indigenous, People of Color (BIPOC), and transgender minorities experience more frequent and severe forms of discrimination than White and cisgender individuals. Aims: This study aims to examine racial/ethnic differences in gender-related discrimination and psychological distress within a sample of transgender individuals. Methods: Using data from a convenience sample of 99 self-identified transgender adults recruited through North American LGBTQ organizations, data were analyzed to determine the relationship between race/ethnicity, gender minority stress, and psychological distress. Results: When White and BIPOC participants are compared, no significant group differences were found in levels of gender discrimination or victimization. However, some individual racial/ethnic groups reported significantly higher or lower scores and results indicate that changes in reported gender minority stress are in fact positively correlated with reported psychological distress. Conclusion: This research highlights that BIPOC are a heterogeneous group; by solely examining race/ethnicity as a binary variable, studies mask potential important differences among different groups.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据