4.7 Article

Platform Governance Design in Platform Ecosystems: Implications for Complementors' Multihoming Decision

期刊

JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT
卷 48, 期 3, 页码 630-656

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/0149206320988337

关键词

platform governance; ecosystem; complementor; multihoming; modularity; app

资金

  1. University of Melbourne Early Career Researcher Grant [ECR0182020]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [71873136]
  3. University of South Carolina Center for International Business Education and Research (CIBER)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study explores the multilateral interdependence among different groups of producers within a platform ecosystem, and suggests that platform owners' governance design may create tensions between platform providers and complementors. While open governance grants greater autonomy to platform providers, it also leads to a more complex ecosystem for complementors, reducing their willingness to move to a more complex ecosystem.
Extant platform research focuses on how platform owners' governance behaviors directly affect complementors. This study explicates the multilateral interdependence among different groups of producers within a platform ecosystem. We theorize about how platform owners' governance design may create frictions between platform providers and complementors. While open governance grants greater autonomy to platform providers, it also cultivates a more complex ecosystem for complementors. Since ecosystem complexity raises the cost of product customization, complementors will be less willing to port an existing complement to a more complex ecosystem, that is, less likely to multihome. The negative effect is weakened as the complementor has greater experience with the destination ecosystem or when the complement exhibits a greater level of modularity. Our analysis of newly launched apps in Apple's iOS and Google's Android smartphone ecosystems finds supportive evidence. We discuss implications for the burgeoning literature on platform ecosystems and complementors.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据