4.5 Article

Reconsidering the digital divide: an analytical framework from access to appropriation

期刊

INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY & PEOPLE
卷 35, 期 2, 页码 647-676

出版社

EMERALD GROUP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1108/ITP-09-2019-0505

关键词

Digital divide; Access; Usage; Appropriation; Methodology

资金

  1. Wee Kim Wee School of Communication and Information, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study aims to provide a more robust measure of the digital divide from access, capabilities to outcomes. The authors hope that this framework, besides complementing current digital divide models, can be applied to different types of participants.
Purpose This paper presents a framework to measure the digital divide by considering a more comprehensive index of information and communication technology (ICT) predictors. The authors also address the conceptual and methodological problems in the digital divide field, given that its focus has been shifted from technological access to higher-order divides over the years. The proposed framework is hypothesized and tested in the context of unemployed and underemployed residents in Singapore. Design/methodology/approach Through a quantitative survey, 302 unemployed and underemployed workers were asked what ICT access, usage and appropriation meant to them. Factor analyses were deployed to identify the underlying, granular dimensions of ICT access, usage and appropriation. Findings The factor analyses revealed an interesting breakdown of the main factors of ICT access, usage and appropriation. The authors found that one's purpose for which technology is accessed, used and appropriated determines how each of the levels of ICT assets is defined. Thus, the authors propose new operational definitions for ICT access, usage and appropriation based on the analyses. Originality/value This study aims to provide a more robust measure of the digital divide from access, capabilities to outcomes. The authors hope that this framework, besides complementing current digital divide models, can be applied to different types of participants.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据