4.6 Article

Communicating Corporate Social Responsibility: External Stakeholder Involvement, Productivity and Firm Performance

期刊

JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ETHICS
卷 178, 期 2, 页码 501-517

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10551-021-04812-5

关键词

CSR communication; Social media; Productivity; Stakeholder involvement

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Assessing the impact of CSR initiatives can be complex for marketers, but social media can increase CSR communication credibility. The authors introduced a new measure, CSR communication productivity (CCP), and found it positively impacts firm performance. External stakeholder involvement in CSR initiatives can also improve CCP and firm performance.
Assessing the impact of CSR initiatives can be a complex task for marketers given the variety of methods of communicating about CSR as well as the broad range of stakeholders that CSR initiatives might interest. Social media helps increase the visibility and credibility of CSR communication and provides new ways of reaching and involving stakeholders in CSR initiatives. Using data collected and coded from Facebook pages of the Top 100 Global Brands, the authors introduce a new measure of effectiveness for CSR communication; CSR communication productivity (CCP). The findings indicate that CCP has a positive impact on firm performance (Tobin's Q). The authors also investigate the impact of External Stakeholder Involvement in CSR initiatives. The results suggest that when external stakeholders are involved in an organization's CSR initiatives, both CCP and firm performance (Tobin's Q) improve. In addition, third-party evaluations of CSR performance positively moderate the impact of External Stakeholder Involvement on CCP. These findings offer contributions to CSR communication and social media marketing theories. They also have implications for marketing managers regarding how to measure and benchmark CCP, and how to maximize returns by involving external stakeholders in CSR efforts.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据