4.8 Review

2D/2D Heterostructures: Rational Design for Advanced Batteries and Electrocatalysis

期刊

ENERGY & ENVIRONMENTAL MATERIALS
卷 5, 期 1, 页码 115-132

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/eem2.12184

关键词

2D heterostructures; 2D nanomaterials; battery; electrocatalysis; energy storage

资金

  1. Australian Research Council (ARC) [DP200103568]
  2. ARC [FT180100387, FT160100281]
  3. QUT 2020 ECR Scheme Grant [2020001179]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Two-dimensional heterostructures consisting of two or more 2D building blocks possess intriguing electronic features at the nanosized interfacial regions. They can effectively modulate the confinement and transport of charge carriers, excitons, etc., bringing about extraordinary properties. Rational design and synthesis can regulate their electrochemical properties for advanced applications in batteries and electrocatalysis.
Two-dimensional/two-dimensional (2D/2D) heterostructures consisting of two or more 2D building blocks possess intriguing electronic features at the nanosized interfacial regions, endowing the possibility for effectively modulating the confinement, and transport of charge carriers, excitons, photons, phonons, etc. to bring about a wide range of extraordinary physical, chemical, thermal, and/or mechanical properties. By rational design and synthesis of 2D/2D heterostructures, electrochemical properties for advanced batteries and electrocatalysis can be well regulated to meet some practical requirements. In this review, a summary on the commonly employed synthetic strategies for 2D/2D heterostructures is first given, followed by a comprehensive review on recent progress for their applications in batteries and various electrocatalysis reactions. Finally, a critical outlook on the current challenges and promising solutions is presented, which is expected to offer some insightful ideas on the design principles of advanced 2D-based nanomaterials to address the current challenges in sustainable energy storages and green fuel generations.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据